MIT Technology Review’s “Old Age is Over” is thought provoking. Or in the case of the technology section – “Old Age is Made Up,” written by Joe Coughlin, head of the MIT Age Lab, the content is just plain provoking. We agree that old age is made up – but in this article, that assertion is underpinned with generalizations that are just, well, also made up. And it shows a lack of understanding about who benefits from technologies that exist in their current form, or that some of those have been upgraded well beyond his generalizations. Consider: Is the PERS industry a failed market? Sized at $3.1 billion, is that failure? And is it just being coy to say that only 2% of the 52 million people
from
https://healthnews010.tumblr.com/post/187481837608
from https://johnher1.blogspot.com/2019/09/reinventing-old-age-some-mit-tech.html
from
https://johnher10.tumblr.com/post/187481940727
From https://stevenbrown1.blogspot.com/2019/09/reinventing-old-age-some-mit-tech.html
from
https://stevenbrown11.wordpress.com/2019/09/04/reinventing-old-age-some-mit-tech-assertions-are-simplistic/
No comments:
Post a Comment